Proposals

Below are some proposals for talks from the past (and current). By clicking on the ID number, more details are shown. By default, these are sorted chronologically (recent first) and by then by last name. The data can be sorted by alternate means by using the links at the top right, each allowing ascending or descending orders.

Displaying 461-471 of 471 results.
ID: 332
Year: 2012
Name: Charles Ashbacher
Institution: #none
Subject area(s): Teaching of statistics
Title of Talk: Bayes' Theorem in the Modern World

Abstract: Despite having been repeatedly debunked, the idea of testing all members of a population for a characteristic a small percentage has continues to appear in our political world. The foolishness of this is easily demonstrated by applying Bayes
ID: 181
Year: 2007
Name: Charles Ashbacher
Institution: #none
Subject area(s):
Title of Talk: Computer Explorations of Prime Conjectures Made by Marnell

Abstract: In 1742, Goldbach made a conjecture that every even integer greater than 2 is expressible as the sum of two primes. While extensive computer searches have failed to find a counterexample, the general conjecture remains open, although nearly everyone believes that it is true. In a recent submission to Journal of Recreational Mathematics, Geoffrey Marnell made ten additional conjectures regarding what can be expressed using prime numbers. This paper gives the results of computer explorations carried out to test the conjectures.
ID: 223
Year: 2008
Name: Charles Ashbacher
Institution: #none
Subject area(s): Recreational mathematics
Title of Talk: Computer Investigations of Problems in Pickover

Abstract: Clifford Pickover, who has been described as the
ID: 318
Year: 2011
Name: David Bressoud
Institution: #non-IA section
Subject area(s):
Title of Talk: Issues of the Transition to College Mathematics

Abstract: Over the past quarter century, 2- and 4-year college enrollment in first semester calculus has remained constant while high school enrollment in calculus has grown tenfold, from 60,000 to 600,000, and continues to grow at 6% per year. We have passed the cross-over point where each year more students study first semester calculus in US high schools than in all 2- and 4-year colleges and universities in the United States. In theory, this should be an engine for directing more students toward careers in science, engineering, and mathematics. In fact, it is having the opposite effect. This talk will present what is known about the effects of this growth and what needs to happen in response within our high schools and universities.
ID: 321
Year: 2011
Name: David Bressoud
Institution: #non-IA section
Subject area(s):
Title of Talk: The Truth of Proofs

Abstract: Mathematicians often delude themselves into thinking that we create proofs in order to establish truth. In fact, that which is "proven" is often not true, and mathematical results are often known with certainty to be true long before a proof is found. I will use some illustrations from the history of mathematics to make this point and to show that proof is more about making connections than establishing truth.
ID: 177
Year: 2006
Name: Kenneth Driessel
Institution: #non-IA section
Subject area(s): classical mechanics, bio-mechanics
Title of Talk: The Dynamics of a Planar Two Link Chain and Some Applications to Human Motion

Abstract: Try the following 'acceleration experiment': Stand balanced with your legs straight and a slight forward bend at the waist. Then step backwards. Consider the following 'acceleration question': How do humans initiate this motion? Or more generally: How do humans usually initiate horizontal motion from a balanced position? (I first met this question when thinking about cross country skiing.) We analyze the acceleration question by analogy. In particular, we study the classical dynamics of a mechanical system consisting of two linked rods. We assume that the first rod is connected to the ground by a hinge. (The first rod corresponds to the human legs. The ground hinge corresponds to the human ankles.) We assume that the second rod is connected to the first one by another hinge. (The second rod corresponds to the human torso. The second hinge corresponds to the human hips.) We derive the equations of motion for this mechanical system. We prove that if the system is initially at rest in a balanced position then gravity causes the center of mass to accelerate in the horizontal direction toward which the system is 'pointed'. We infer that the step backwards in the acceleration experiment is initiated by a relaxation of the muscles at the hips. Reference: Kenneth R. Driessel and Irvin R. Hentzel, 'Dynamics of a Planar Two Link Chain', http://www.fiberpipe.net/~driessel/2-links.pdf
ID: 396
Year: 2014
Name: Dave Renfro
Institution: #business/industry/government
Subject area(s): calculus, real analysis
Title of Talk: Calculus Curiosities

Abstract: Over the years I have collected a lot of little-known mathematical curiosities and minutia from various books and journal articles. This talk is intended to be a "show and tell" for some of this material, mostly restricted to things that could be of use in first year calculus courses, or at least to things likely to be of interest to teachers of such courses.
ID: 262
Year: 2009
Name: Louis Kauffman
Institution: University of Illinois at Chicago
Subject area(s): MAA George Polya Lecturer
Title of Talk: Introduction to Knot Theory

Abstract: The theory of knots is a recent part of mathematics. It originated in the tabulation of tables of knots by the mathematicians Tait, Kirkman and Little in the 19th century. These tables were prepared at the behest of Lord Kelvin (Sir William Thompson) who had developed a theory that atoms were three dimensional knotted vortices in the luminiferous aether. Along with these speculations came the development of geometry and topology in the hands of Gauss, Riemann, Poincare and others. As the knotted vortex theory declined (it has never entirely disappeared!), the mathematics of topology ascended, and the theory of knots came into being as part of the study of low dimensional manifolds, using the fundamental group of Poincare and early versions of homology theory. Max Dehn used the fundamental group to show that a trefoil knot and its mirror image are topologically distinct. J. W. Alexander in the 1920's found a polynomial invariant of knots that bears his name to this day. Kurt Reidemeister, in the 1920's, discovered a set of moves on diagrams for knots that made their classification a (difficult) combinatorial problem. In the 1980's there came a rebirth of these combinatorial schemes in the discovery of the Jones polynomial invariant of knots and links (and its relatives and descendants). Along with the new combinatorial invariants came new relationships with physics and with many fields of mathematics (combinatorics, graph theory, Hopf algebras, Lie algebras, von Neumann algebras, functional integration, category theory) and new kinds of mathematics such as higher categories and categorification. This talk will discuss the history of knot theory and then it will concentrate on describing the Jones polynomial, its relationships with physics, and recent developments related to categorification.
ID: 40
Year: 2004
Name: a.m. fink
Institution:
Subject area(s):
Title of Talk: The effect of philosophy on curriculum

Abstract: I wrote a history of the Iowa State Mathematics Department and discovered that the curriculum offered was very dependent on outside influences and the philosophy of eductation of the those outside influences.
ID: 109
Year: 2005
Name: Charles Ashbacher
Institution:
Subject area(s): Recreational mathematics
Title of Talk: Searching For Images Embedded in Mathematics

Abstract: In the science fiction book
ID: 133
Year: 2005
Name: Phil Wood
Institution:
Subject area(s): Calculus
Title of Talk: Simple Teaching of Differential Calculus

Abstract: Calculus may be taught more understandably by first describing its practical uses and then presenting it as simple algebra and geometry. In doing this all mention of infinitesimals, increments, theory of limits and formal proofs has been eliminated.